Friday, March 31st, 2006
Anti-“Chief” Group
Responds to Recent Developments Regarding “Chief Illiniwek”
The Progressive Resource/Action Cooperative (PRC), who
has been fighting for the elimination of “Chief Illiniwek”
since 1989, commends the National Collegiate Athletic Association on
following through on examining the use of race based mascots, specifically
how it applies to the University of Illinois and “Chief Illiniwek.”
On March 7th, the NCAA Staff Committee issued a response to the four
points laid out in U of I’s appeal. On March 28th, Board Chairman
Eppley, on behalf of the University, submitted a rebuttal statement
for the April 28th appeal hearing, when the final decision will be made.
One of the points the University challenged the NCAA
on is the use of the terms “Illini” and “Fighting
Illini.” The University of Illinois feels the terms are “closely
related to the name of the state and not directly associated with Native
Americans.” In a guest commentary featured in The News-Gazette,
UI History Professors Hoxie and Roediger wrote, “Soon after the
student newspaper changed its name to the ‘Illini’ in 1874,
university clubs arose named ‘Sachem’ and ‘Ma-wan-da’
and their members held ceremonies in which white students wrapped themselves
in blankets and smoked ‘peace pipes.’ Early 20th-century
athletic teams were often referred to as ‘Indians,’ and
in 1914 an association of athletes was created called ‘The Tribe
of the Illini’.” Although the term “Illini”
was first used to refer to the university’s newspaper in 1874,
it was quickly used in context with “Indians,” “Illini
tribesmen,” “braves,” “warriors” and other
terms that connected U of I’s athletics to a fascination with
American Indians. This connection was well established before the campaign
to build Memorial Stadium and by the time “Chief Illiniwek”
was created in 1926 (source: The Illio). Historical evidence makes it
quite clear that the use of the term “Fighting Illini” is
not and cannot be separated from the use of the “Chief”
or from American Indian references in general. Although the NCAA has
tentatively allowed U of I to continue using “Illini” and
“Fighting Illini” during NCAA tournaments, the PRC calls
on the NCAA to overturn this decision during the April 28th appeal hearing
due to this historical evidence.
The next point U of I contends is that the tradition
of the “Chief” is not intended nor does it actually create
a “hostile” and “abusive” environment. Although
the intentions surrounding the “Chief Illiniwek” tradition
may not intend to be hostile, it is clear that it does indeed create
a “hostile” and “abusive” environment. In the
Focused Visit Report issued by the North Collegiate Association, the
agency which accredits the University, they wrote, “In summary,
the institution’s symbol is an embarrassment to many of its most
distinguished constituents. It creates a situation in which expressions
of opinion by students, faculty, leadership, or applicants for positions
at the institution may be stifled or lead to harassment. It creates
a situation where some faculty and staff do not want to attend national
meetings, especially meetings dealing with diversity issues, because
of the “hypocrisy they sense in the institution’s continued
use of the symbol. It creates a situation which can cause peers and
colleagues across the country to decide against applying for positions
on the UI campus or participation in events held there. It appears likely
to diminish the pool of candidates for the institution’s highest
positions and could interfere with the selection process to fill those
positions.”
Next, the U of I raises the concern over the institutional
autonomy of member organizations. In the Staff Committee’s Response,
the NCAA wrote, “As was noted when the August 2005 policy was
announced, the Executive Committee is not interfering with member institutions’
right to determine what their nickname, mascots or imagery will be.
Institutional autonomy continues to be a valued principle. The Executive
Committee’s policy applies only to the context of NCAA championships.”
The University also challenges whether or not the issue of Native American
mascots is a “’core issue,” and instead labels it
as “sociological or political issues.” Fundamentally, the
issue of mascots like “Chief Illiniwek” is race and racism,
inclusion, and diversity. It is institutions like the University of
Illinois who have ignored these problems that have made the situation
into a “political issue.”
Finally, the University cites the NCAA for their “flawed
process” in dealing with race-based mascots. In the University’s
appeal, they laid out these concerns and the NCAA appropriately and
clearly addressed their concerns in the Staff Committee’s Response
dated March 7th, 2006. Of interest to the PRC is Chairman Eppley’s
mention of the PRC’s submittal of information to the NCAA during
the review process. It is true that the PRC sent several packets of
information to the NCAA administrators to provide a supplementary resource
about “Chief Illiniwek.” All of the documents have been
previously presented to the University Board and Administration over
the past seventeen years, often falling on deaf ears. The PRC would
be more than willing to provide the documents to Chairman Eppley, but
it is unnecessary as this information is also easily accessible on various
websites.
In 2001, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a
report on the use of Native American sport symbols and very poignantly
wrote, “The stereotyping of any racial, ethnic, religious or other
groups when promoted by our public educational institutions, teach all
students that stereotyping of minority groups is acceptable, a dangerous
lesson in a diverse society. Schools have a responsibility to educate
their students; they should not use their influence to perpetuate misrepresentations
of any culture or people.” The Progressive Resource/Action Cooperative
implores the University Board of Trustees, specifically Chairman Eppley,
to heed the vast collection of resources calling for the end of the
use of race-based mascots and eliminate “Chief Illiniwek”
today in it’s entirety—name, dance, and logo.
Download PRC's Press Release (pdf)
Download U of I's Rebuttal Statement (pdf)
Download NCAA's Staff Committee Response (pdf)
See
The News-Gazette Story from March 30, 2006