Allegation System | Rule and Procedure | Policy Transmittals | Federal and State Law | Clinical Skills and Research | Table of Contents
6.5.1 Placement Criteria | 6.5.2 Child Specific Placement Selection Factors | 6.5.3 Permanency Factors in Placement Selection | 6.5.4 Caregiver-Specific Factors to Consider to Enhance Permanency | 6.5.5 Pre-placement
Placement selection should be a carefully planned process with deliberate consideration of multiple variables and factors involving the child, the placement resource and the child's family. It requires thorough assessment of the child and placement resource. The worker is responsible for preparing the child and family for placement and obtaining as much information about the child as possible.
All placements must be consistent with the best interests and special needs of the child. However, it is important to acknowledge that in placing a child, "the caseworker may at times be forced to choose a `least detrimental alternative' " (Steinhauer, l991). Caseworkers must balance the potential risk of harm to the child of leaving him/her in a less-than-satisfactory family against the emotional harm of removing the child from that family, disrupting the continuity of care and attachment. This is not an easy decision and always requires consultation with the supervisor.
When a child is removed from the care of a custodial parent, the CPSW and/or the permanency worker will explore in this order:
Refer to Rule and Procedure, Appendix C, P301-2 for five circumstances under which it shall be in the best interest of the child to be placed apart from siblings.
All placements should be made based on the following principles:
When children need placement, the child protective services worker and/or the permanency worker should gather as much information as possible regarding the child and his or her needs. Much of the information should already be known if the child is being placed from a family who has previously received services from the Department. It is imperative that the worker matches the needs and characteristics that are known about the child to the strengths, interests and skills of the resource.
The key question a caseworker must address is "which placement resource can best meet the child's needs for safety, well being and permanency?" While the initial placement may be based on limited information due to the urgency of providing immediate protection, every effort should be made to utilize all of the available information in order to place the child in a first placement which can best meet his or her needs.
A thorough, accurate assessment of the child should be obtained during the first 30 days of case opening before making long-term or permanent placement decisions. Not only is it highly likely that the child's behavior will be atypical during the early stages of the placement, many times essential information regarding the child's history, development, coping strategies, medical and education needs is unknown.
Once a thorough assessment has been completed , the caseworker should consider the range of placement types available that can meet the child's individual needs. (Types of placement options may include placement with the non-custodial parent or placement in foster homes, kinship care, diagnostic centers and/or residential care [with appropriate approval]). The search for the best placement match should involve the Child and Family Team (worker, the supervisor, parents, extended family and providers) and should be driven by the child's permanency goal.
Placement, which is a critical casework decision as specified in Rule 315, must be discussed with and approved by the worker's supervisor and documented in the case record. All Placement Clearance Desk procedures prescribed in Rule 301 must be followed.
Caseworkers must consider the following child-specific factors and document these factors on the Child/Caregiver Matching Tool when selecting a substitute care placement:
Note that when looking at behavior, it is important to distinguish which behaviors may be historical (i.e., exhibited by the child over time) and which behaviors are reactive (i.e., a response to the trauma of DCFS involvement and subsequent removal from the birth parents). This distinction is significant in developing a meaningful behavioral profile of the child so that the best match can be made.
At times the initial match is enduring and appropriate. However, in other instances it is necessary, based on additional information and changing case circumstances, to make a placement change based on the permanency needs of the child. Making this change to support and achieve permanency is consistent with the general tenets of concurrent planning. An example of a placement change to support permanency is the movement of a child from a foster home to an adoptive home when the assessment is completed and concludes that adoption is in the child's best interests. Between the 30th and 90th day any necessary placement choices should have been identified and an appropriate placement made that meets the child's long-term need for permanency, well being and safety.
The caseworker should consider the following permanency factors when selecting a placement resource:
Information regarding the possible placement options is also needed. This information may come from a variety of sources that change from region to region based on who fills these roles.
Following are some sources of information about resources:
The foster family (or other caregiver) also has responsibility in this placement selection process. They need to know which child characteristics or dynamics they can work with and offer feedback as to whether they can fully serve the referred child and her or his family. For example, resources that are willing to work with parents should be identified and utilized by permanency staff accordingly. Resources that are willing to participate in an in-depth assessment process should be identified and used accordingly. The challenge to both the potential placement resource and the permanency worker is to accurately determine what types of activities and with what types of children and families the placement works best. While placement resources are seen as having a standard baseline with regards to competencies, reality dictates that each resource may in fact have different interests, skills and tolerances with regard to children placed with them and their families.
Placement should never be taken lightly; it may very well represent the most serious emotional trauma that a child will experience. Time spent on pre-placement activities can reduce trauma and problems that the child may later experience in placement. By preparing the child for placement the worker is attending to the child in a very professional and humane manner.
To reduce the child's trauma, the caseworker should encourage parents to provide information and assist in preparing the child for separation and subsequent placement. In helping the child during the placement process, the parent is demonstrating interest in and concern for the child's well-being while showing the worker they can put the needs of the child ahead of their own needs and feelings. Engaging the parent in helping their child enables the parent to develop strengths that can be used in resolving problems and achieving permanency.
The pre-placement activities described below can be performed prior to the initial placement or prior to a change of placement, including return home.
The pre-placement activities should be followed with the initial placement and any subsequent placements. They ease the child's adjustment not only to the initial placement but also to any subsequent changes in placement, including return home.
6.5.1 Placement Criteria | 6.5.2 Child Specific Placement Selection Factors | 6.5.3 Permanency Factors in Placement Selection | 6.5.4 Caregiver-Specific Factors to Consider to Enhance Permanency | 6.5.5 Pre-placement
You can also access the graphic version of Placement.